Works about as well as ordinary calorie cutting, not better; longer life shown only in mice so far.
What you hear: “Squeezing your meals into a short daily window (like 16:8) burns more fat than ordinary dieting and helps you live longer.”
A 2026 Cochrane review of 22 trials (1,995 adults) found fasting plans gave about the same weight loss as regular diet advice (a difference of 0.33 percentage points of body weight, not significant). In a 12-month trial, eating only between 8am and 4pm plus calorie limits lost 8.0 kg versus 6.3 kg for calorie limits alone, a 1.8 kg gap that was not significant. A 2025 BMJ analysis of 99 trials found only alternate-day fasting beat steady calorie cutting, by about 1.3 kg, in mostly short trials. Longer life has been shown in mice; in people, observational data instead link eating one meal a day to a 30% higher death rate (a link, not proof).
Take care: In a small trial of people with type 2 diabetes on glucose-lowering medicines, fasting days roughly doubled low-blood-sugar episodes, so anyone taking insulin or diabetes medicines should plan fasting with their doctor.
If a shorter eating window helps you eat less, it is a fair option, but pick the plan you can stick with rather than expecting extra fat loss.
See it in the habit library, with what it means for your own longevity score.
Not medical advice. General information from published studies, not a diagnosis or a treatment plan. Talk with your doctor before starting a supplement or changing a medicine, especially if you are pregnant, take other medicines or have a health condition.
Partly true: Some truth, but oversold as usually said. We judge the claim as it is usually said online, not the habit itself. Trials assign people at random, so they can show cause; observed studies follow people and show a link, not proof. Last checked: October 2026.
Compared to regular dietary advice, intermittent fasting may result in little to no difference in percentage from baseline weight loss (MD -0.33, 95% CI -0.92 to 0.26; 21 studies, 1430 participants; low-certainty evidence due to risk of bias).
Changes in weight were not significantly different in the two groups at the 12-month assessment (net difference, -1.8 kg; 95% CI, -4.0 to 0.4; P = 0.11).
Compared with continuous energy restriction, alternate day fasting was the only form of intermittent fasting diet strategy to show benefit in body weight reduction (mean difference -1.29 kg (95% CI -1.99 to -0.59), moderate certainty of evidence).
Compared with participants eating three meals per day, the multivariable-adjusted HRs for participants eating one meal per day were 1.30 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.64) for all-cause mortality
their findings are encouraging for future studies on how these types of time-restricted eating patterns might help humans
Fasting increased the rate of hypoglycaemia despite medication reduction (RR 2.05, 95% CI 1.17 to 3.52).
One short email when we add new studies or exercises, each with its source. No spam, and you can unsubscribe any time.